Hypacrosaurus is one of those dinosaurs that is still actively studied and new findings pop up now and again that are interesting thanks to all of that study. Earlier this year, for instance, Bailleul, Hall, and Horner released a paper on PloSONE.org that announces what they contend is the first evidence of secondary cartilage ever found in a fossil dinosaur, from a Hypacrosaurus. The trio took thin histological samples from the facial areas of hatchling Hypacrosaurs to determine whether or not secondary cartilage could be found in dinosaurs and have released figures in their paper which show where they found the cartilage and how that compares to a modern bird's cartilage placement. It is a very interesting find and quite intriguing when anything, even something this small is newly discovered.
The second paper I found that is interesting is the original 1913 paper by Brown describing and naming the genus and species of Hypacrosaurus. Barnum Brown's paper about a new trachodont dinosaur is not the most exciting paper ever, but papers that name new animals are always interesting and fun to read, as fun as scientific literature can be, keep in mind. The last paper, a 2008 paper by Cooper, Lee, Taper, and Horner, is more specifically about the growth rates of predators and prey, but it does discuss the growth rates of Hypacrosaurus in its overall study of the predator prey relationship. The Royal Society website hosts the paper freely, which is a great service to amateur readers, much like PloSONE, and so if you are interested in the entire paper on growth, you can actually read it all, not like some papers we share here.
STL Science Center
31 July 2012
30 July 2012
Hypacrosaurus In Motion
29 July 2012
Laura and the Kids
Laura is a juvenile Hypacrosaurus. Not only Laura, but a lot, of other Hypacrosaurs are available to kids to educate them about this rather tall dinosaur. My favorite, as always, Kid's Dinos, has a page on Hypacrosaurus and I always love sharing that with the children who read this or are the children of readers. Enchanted Learning also has one today and thankfully it does not have one of its scary drawings up. Hypacrosaurus is one of those hadrosaurs found with hatchlings that immediately is shared with children by toy makers, book publishers, and other forms of media because, it seems, that babies make children more interested in purchasing things; at least that's what it seems to sound like. Regardless, I found a good coloring page also which you can find below or at this link to Education.com.
28 July 2012
Very Tall Pictures
©Nobu Tamura |
©Raul Martin |
©Michiel Gilissen |
27 July 2012
An Almost Tall Enough Lizard
Almost, but not quite as tall. Artist unfound so far. |
26 July 2012
Popular Roosters
They're a little hard to see from here, but a real Buitreraptor would be, since it's so small. |
25 July 2012
Weird Anatomy?
Buitreraptor is noticeably different from the Laurasian, or Northern, dromaeosaurs, as are all Southern, or Gondwanan, dromaeosaurs. That makes sense though; large birds have evolved in Australia as well as Africa but they are very different also, as one of many many living examples. Regardless, this small chicken sized dinosaur was very different from what we visualize when we think of "raptors" from North America and Asia. The differences stick out from first glance in some prominent ways, the most prominent being the shape of the body, nose to tail. Buitreraptor is shaped like other dromaeosaurs, however, it looks as though it was laid on its side and gently pressed flat compared to other robust and deep faced and barreled chested raptors like Utahraptor or Deinonychus. The skull and the torso of Buitreraptor are very thin and elongated by dromaeosaur standards. That skull also houses different teeth; grooved recurve teeth are there instead of the expected serrated and meat tearing teeth of other dromaeosaurs. Obviously there was a reason for the body to take shape in this way, but as of yet there are conjectures and theories, but no single "Aha!" idea. The fact that two of the original four found skeletons remain undescribed probably has something to do with that, though not as much as the fact that this is an extinct dinosaur; more description helps of course, but we have to remember it can only take us so far before a little educated guessing from environmental context clues and, dare I say it of scientists?, a little bit of a healthy imagination also.
As far as the feathers of Buitreraptor are concerned, so far, that is an educated guess based on other raptors. There has been no evidence unearthed thus far that points toward the inclusion of feathers on a Buitreraptor frame. It's not a bad guess though, considering the evidence found on other dromaeosaurs, but we also have to remember this was an animal that evolved in the Late Cretaceous far away from those other raptors and as such may be vastly different even where feathers are concerned. Another thing that is strange about Buitreraptor is that its toes and fingers aren't we have come to expect from dromaeosaurs either. In fact, the hands of Buitreraptor have three fingers that are almost all the same length, which is very strange for a dromaeosaur, along with the arms being shorter than its cousin's arms. That killing claw on the foot we expect to be large, curved, and thin like a knife blade was actually somewhat broad and much shorter proportionately to those of larger dromaeosaurs. All said and done the anatomy of this dinosaur was rather unique and very interesting as well as not very well understood yet.
He may be tiny, but I've been chased by a rooster, and it had fewer weapons and I was still scared like a little girl |
24 July 2012
Articles Everywhere
Since 2005 articles have popped up quite often about Buitreraptor, its diet, or the general state of dromaeosaurs in the Southern Hemisphere. At least one of them refers mainly to the area in which Buitreraptor was originally found, an area of Argentina called La Buitrera. One of the articles that deals more with the area than specifically Buitreraptor all the way through it is from earlier in 2012 and is titled Cretaceous Small Scavengers: Feeding Traces in Tetrapod Bones from Patagonia, Argentina and is coauthored by one of the men, Apesteguia, who coauthored the original 2005 paper with Makovicky which announced Buitreraptor to the world. This newer paper traces out the evidence that points to Buitreraptor, and other small dinosaurs of the area, being scavengers at least in part if not as their whole diet. The original paper, however, appeared in Nature in October 2005 and described the small Argentinian dromeaosaur for the first time. Unfortunately, only the abstract of the article is available free from Nature.
In 2009 Novas, et al., delved further into the entire southern dromaeosaur family by exploring a new dinosaur, Austroraptor cabazai, and then describing the evolution of Unenlagiinae, the group to which this new animal and Buitrreraptor belong to. One of the figures presented in the paper compares known dimensions of some of the bones of group members for comparison; very interesting information. Makovicky and Apesteguia worked on another paper together recently, in 2010, in which they went over the teeth of Buitreraptor in detail and also discussed the teeth of other Gondwanan dromaeosaurs as well. Anyone as interested in dromaeosaurs as I tend to be will find all of these articles very interesting given that they are about the newest found populations of dromaeosaurs. The southern, Gondwanan, dromaeosaurs are still relatively unknown, so the number of papers available to learn from is both fantastic and amazing, given how hard it is to find good articles on even famous dinosaurs sometimes.
23 July 2012
Movieless Mondays
Buitreraptor, like so many relatively new dinosaurs, and Southern Hemisphere dinosaurs, does not have any dedicated documentaries or passing mentions in any other documentaries. It is sad, of course, but at least Buitreraptor has some mentions in videos. One very short clip shows the entirety of the skeleton in a closeup pan over, which is great if you cannot get to a museum where a cast is mounted to look at the strange skeleton of this animal.
Additionally, there are the typical "tribute" videos even for Buitreraptor, but since it is so new and relatively unknown, there is only one of those.
This tribute is not too over the top as we have seen in the past and is not infused with "screamo" music either, instead it has rap, so if you hate rap mute that thing up and just watch the slideshow!
22 July 2012
Little For A Sunday
Buitreraptor is a small animal, and its involvement in areas of world culture which promote kids to learn about it, are equally small. There is the mounted skeleton shared on Friday in the Field Museum, and so we know that any children lucky enough to go see it can learn something about it. As far as coloring and fact files, the only place it seems we will be able to get either is from the Natural History Museum in London. Some of the images on the page could serve as improvised coloring pages, which is nice. One other good place to find the info would be in the National Geographic Dinopedia, the page for Buitreraptor is available online.
21 July 2012
Different Versions of A Diminuitive Dromaeosaur
Little dinosaurs are always intriguing and all dinosaurs, including the little ones, typically have multiple representations drawn out by different artists as to how they should have looked, acted, been colored, ornamented, and presented themselves in social settings. Dromaeosaurs have always been a hot point of contention for paleontologists and illustrators and therefore we see a lot of illustrations that either bridge two views or highly represent one or the other. These days that is less true as most artists have adopted the heavily feathered and avian look of dromaeosaurs. In this case we have a heavily avian influenced version of Buitreraptor, which I believe I forgot to mention means "Gonzalez's Vulture Roost Thief," that is pretty wonderful, though the snout looks a bit strange and shorter than I think it should be.
This illustration retains the feathering, as is the popular trend, as previously mentioned, but reverts the anatomical characteristics of Buitreraptor to much more saurian characteristics. The more reptilian body does, however, fit the structure of the skeleton as shown when mounted with an elongated snout and a narrow body profile. The fingers are lost in feathering, but my still retain the strange, for a dromaeosaur, hand and arm proportions found in its family (subfamily: Unenlagiinae). This fact makes sense when geography is considered because it was a Southern Hemisphere dinosaur whereas the best known and largest family sampling of dromaeosaurs comes from the Northern Hemisphere. Something was sure to be different between the two branches and the hand and arm proportions of the southern families must have adapted the way they did in order to best equip the animals for their environment, which we know was very different geographically, from the northern families territories.
This is a photo illustration, meaning the artist used photos and illustrated around them as well. The overall body appearance agrees with an illustration by Matt Martyniuk on his blog. Additionally, as the artist stated, the positioning of the animal was inspired by Black Heron fishing habits. The idea that Buitreraptor may have fished this way is original to the artist, but has fairly good merit and the idea that the arm feathers may have been used to reduce glare from the sun for fishing purposes is intriguing and original. It does make me wonder though, with the nostrils so low on the snout, could the animal have managed to not disturb the water in pursuing fish with its breathing in or out?
©Vladimir Nikolov |
©Mike Keesey |
20 July 2012
Rooster Sized Terror in the South
First and foremost, for all of those that missed me I am back. Those of you who did not, that's okay, but I missed writing this thing every morning! I'm finally settled enough into the new place that my internet is up and running;three cheers for cheaper than ATT wifi connections! Anywho...
Once upon a time in Cretaceous Argentina there was a terror lurking in the shadows of the land, almost literally. While the large theropods and sauropods of the Southern Hemisphere flitted about there was, in their shadows, Buitreraptor. Buitreraptor gonzalezorum was discovered in 2005 and is only the size of a robust rooster. However, Buitreraptor was still a terrible predator due to the fact that, despite being one of a very few southern dromaeosaurs, it possessed large claws on both hands and feet and had a strong, but elongated muzzle filled with small grooved and recurved teeth. The size of this animal, given the relative sizes of other contemporary dinosaurs, makes him fit into the niche of lizard and mammal hunter better than any other category. Scavenging is another possibility, though not as heavily supported. Buitreraptor has many strange anatomical differences that separate it from its Northern, and even Southern, cousins. Its hands are constructed differently in terms of finger length, its "killing claw" is certainly different, and its body, snout included, was very long for how small it was. Tomorrow we will look at how all of those body parts come together to form and impressive, yet strange little dinosaur.
Once upon a time in Cretaceous Argentina there was a terror lurking in the shadows of the land, almost literally. While the large theropods and sauropods of the Southern Hemisphere flitted about there was, in their shadows, Buitreraptor. Buitreraptor gonzalezorum was discovered in 2005 and is only the size of a robust rooster. However, Buitreraptor was still a terrible predator due to the fact that, despite being one of a very few southern dromaeosaurs, it possessed large claws on both hands and feet and had a strong, but elongated muzzle filled with small grooved and recurved teeth. The size of this animal, given the relative sizes of other contemporary dinosaurs, makes him fit into the niche of lizard and mammal hunter better than any other category. Scavenging is another possibility, though not as heavily supported. Buitreraptor has many strange anatomical differences that separate it from its Northern, and even Southern, cousins. Its hands are constructed differently in terms of finger length, its "killing claw" is certainly different, and its body, snout included, was very long for how small it was. Tomorrow we will look at how all of those body parts come together to form and impressive, yet strange little dinosaur.
12 July 2012
Famous Dinosaurs
Einiosaurus, with all of its evidence of herding behavior and ample evidence of existence that has allowed for in depth study has become somewhat famous for more than just having a strange nasal horn. It has appeared in documentaries, cartoons, and even the Dinosaur King card game. Despite the debate over the placement of Einiosaurus in the tree of life, Einiosaurus is definitely agreed into which family and clade it fits. The "fame" of this dinosaur is well documented and specimens, despite being a Montana only dinosaur living in a range of 500,000 to a million years of history, are still available to be found and unearthed which means here is always the chance of another great Einiosaurus find.
Next week we will be in the process of moving homes and so the blog my be down until next Friday. I have tried with all my ability to avoid this, but it doesn't look like I'll be able to unfortunately.
Next week we will be in the process of moving homes and so the blog my be down until next Friday. I have tried with all my ability to avoid this, but it doesn't look like I'll be able to unfortunately.
11 July 2012
The Strange Placement of Einiosaurus
Sampson's 1995 paper supports the position that Einiosaurus, Pachyrhinosaurus, and Anchelosaurus are all closely related. The other theory that has been put forward is that Einiosaurus is closely related to Styracosaurus and Centrosaurus. Part of the determining factor in each theory is the construction of the skull. All of the above animals have similar horny frills. The frill of Einiosaurus, Pachyrhinosaurus, and Anchelosaurus all have two large horns of bone that extend from the top central area of the skull frill. Styracosaurus however, has multiple horns extending from the frill and Centrosaurus possesses two small inward curving horns of bone at the top of the central area of the frill. Therefore, Einiosaurus can logically fit in either family group as an intermediate frill design between Pachrhinosaurus and Anchelosaurus and between Centrosaurus and Styracosaurus on the other side of the debate.
In terms of nasal horns, however, the debate changes a little bit. The horns of Styracosaurus then Centrosaurus, and then finally Einiosaurus, in this line of the debate, slowly began, and ultimately did, curve forward as the species evolved from one another. The horns on the other side of the debate start with Einiosaurus as the earliest species, and the nasal horns gradually were lost to a prominence like a shield boss much more than a horn covered bone. This change from horn to rough boss are endorsed by Horner's research as well as Sampson's paper. Supraorbital horns on all five mentioned dinosaurs are nominally present as either small knobs of bone or by being absent entirely from the skulls.
Given the arguments, it seems, and this is entirely my opinion, that both theories may actually be one theory. The nasal horn of Styracosaurus curves in a slightly posterior facing manner, whereas the Centrosaurus nasal horn faces somewhat forward. It makes sense, that the nasal horn of Einiosaurus curving even more forward, which must have had some special reasoning or function, could certainly come next in this line. Continued evolution could certainly then follow into the next proposed line where the nasal horns adapted into the rough bosses of the Pachyrhinosaurus and then Anchelosaurus as well. It's just a thought, but I think it is one worth looking into if no one has before, and since I have not found a paper that says it has been looked at, it certainly should be looked at.
In terms of nasal horns, however, the debate changes a little bit. The horns of Styracosaurus then Centrosaurus, and then finally Einiosaurus, in this line of the debate, slowly began, and ultimately did, curve forward as the species evolved from one another. The horns on the other side of the debate start with Einiosaurus as the earliest species, and the nasal horns gradually were lost to a prominence like a shield boss much more than a horn covered bone. This change from horn to rough boss are endorsed by Horner's research as well as Sampson's paper. Supraorbital horns on all five mentioned dinosaurs are nominally present as either small knobs of bone or by being absent entirely from the skulls.
Given the arguments, it seems, and this is entirely my opinion, that both theories may actually be one theory. The nasal horn of Styracosaurus curves in a slightly posterior facing manner, whereas the Centrosaurus nasal horn faces somewhat forward. It makes sense, that the nasal horn of Einiosaurus curving even more forward, which must have had some special reasoning or function, could certainly come next in this line. Continued evolution could certainly then follow into the next proposed line where the nasal horns adapted into the rough bosses of the Pachyrhinosaurus and then Anchelosaurus as well. It's just a thought, but I think it is one worth looking into if no one has before, and since I have not found a paper that says it has been looked at, it certainly should be looked at.
10 July 2012
Einiosaurus in Writing
In 1995, after multiple specimens, and herds actually, had been unearthed in the 1980's and after a number of years of study, Scott Sampson unleashed upon the world his description of both Einiosaurus and Anchelosaurus. The Dinosaur Society helped pay for the appearance of the scholarly paper in the Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology (Vol. 15 No. 4). The JSTOR version of the paper can be accessed through the members pages of the SVP. Additionally, there is a book on horned dinosaurs, by David West, called Triceratops and Other Horned Herbivores that does a very good job of describing the attributes and explaining the life of not only Einiosaurus but also many other horned dinosaurs in a way that a younger audience will understand. The book preview is actually fairly in depth compared to most previews one can get online, which is very nice. I especially like how the contents compare each animal to a modern white rhino.
09 July 2012
Einiosaurus in motion
08 July 2012
Einiosaurus is One Friendly Dinosaur
There are a lot of instances online for you and that child, or inner child, in your life to play games and have child related fun today. First of all, there is no Kid's Dinos page, but there is the Dinosaur Train Field Guide, which I always like as much as Kid's Dinos. There is an entry there because in an episode called "Have You Heard About the Herd?" which may look familiar if you watched the episode about Hesperornis because they're two halves of the same episode. I have to admit though, I am far more excited today about the Einiosaurus puzzle I found online, the illustration used is by Walter Myers, and the coloring pictures below, even if they aren't necessarily coloring pages. Enjoy having family fun today!
The second image I am waiting on the permission of the artist, but I'll get it up here as soon as possible! You can find it here though.
Update:
I got permission finally, so feel free to use this one as well!
Larger version not available right now, but I'm going to check back |
Update:
I got permission finally, so feel free to use this one as well!
07 July 2012
Herded Animal Images
Courtesy Natural History Museum London, copyright holder not found |
Skeletons for auction in 2009 of Einiosaurus |
06 July 2012
Eini Minie Moe
©James Gurney and courtesy of USPS |
05 July 2012
Nothing Famous About Presbyornis
Truly, the title says it all. I still have no unearthed any toys, dedicated books, sections of books, videos, songs, or anything else which would create awareness of Presbyornis in the general public. In its own way that is pretty funny and amazing at the same time. This is an ancestor of the living inhabitants of the order anseriformes who make going to the park with a loaf of stale bread oh so much fun, but it shares almost none of the fame and love that its descendants get. A three foot tall duck would probably be a frightening park pond inhabitant anyhow, but I bet it would still love stale bread. I declare that today should be a day for everyone to go to their local pond or park where ducks, and geese, live and throw them some stale bread, cereal, and crackers in memory of Presbyornis!
04 July 2012
Some Notes on Presbyornis' Anatomy
I think I have touched on most everything in terms of the anatomy here and there for Presbyornis at one point or another this week. However, there are always some glossed over pieces of information which are worthy of looking back over and since we have discussed the majority of the anatomy, in short spaces here, you know there is more to say. The first thing we should cover though is not so much about the bird as it is a man named Alexander Wetmore. Typically in the early 20th century and late 19th century we know all the names of all the paleontologists who made discoveries, but, to this point in the blog, this is the first contribution to the field by Alexander Wetmore. What's more, Wetmore was not some here then gone scientist but a prominent old man, he lived to be 92 and died in 1978, who was the sixth secretary of the Smithsonian, worked with the Department of Agriculture, and has had quite a few birds named after him; which he deserves given his lifetime of avian research.
One thing I did not discuss in too great a detail was the skull of Presbyornis. Sure it was made for dabbling, like its modern duck cousins, but it was also extremely duck-like for such an ancient and basic duck ancestor. However, if it is not broken do not fix it applies in situations like this very well. The shape of the bill was, and is still in geese and ducks, perfect for scooping up items out of the water and nipping vegetation, though it has obviously seen adaptations and repurposing depending on individual species' needs over the millenia since this animal strutted about. The skull is visibly lightweight, even my amateur self can tell looking at it that it would not be a heavy skull, and I am sure in this animal it would have had adapted blood vessels and nerves in it to counter the height from which it would be bending to dabble about in the vegetation and shallow waters.
The legs of Presbyornis, remember, were not typically of duck and goose length, but more like their cousins the cranes and herons. This led to that height change and a need for blood flow regulation; think about when you bend over for a long time and then stand back up straight. Imagine a very tall duck with a head rush from bending over on its stilt like legs. It would probably be pretty funny actually. Now if we only had the soft tissue to study the mechanics of how it would work to not get dizzy and fall over. I personally do not know the best modern analog to this, however, I bet a giraffe's ability to bend over and drink and a flamingo's ability to feed by bending over are fairly good modern examples of the types of mechanics we would expect to see in this animal. Conversely, maybe it didn't need to feed with its head below its belt at all. Perhaps it used those long legs, rather unlike a crane, to wade into belly deep water (negating the space and milliseconds of advantage in distancing below surface predators speculated on earlier) and fed at a much more comfortable angle. All of this is speculation however as I have not read or found anywhere solid proof positive feeding habits of Presbyornis and have come to what are basically, my own conclusions and conjectures.
One thing I did not discuss in too great a detail was the skull of Presbyornis. Sure it was made for dabbling, like its modern duck cousins, but it was also extremely duck-like for such an ancient and basic duck ancestor. However, if it is not broken do not fix it applies in situations like this very well. The shape of the bill was, and is still in geese and ducks, perfect for scooping up items out of the water and nipping vegetation, though it has obviously seen adaptations and repurposing depending on individual species' needs over the millenia since this animal strutted about. The skull is visibly lightweight, even my amateur self can tell looking at it that it would not be a heavy skull, and I am sure in this animal it would have had adapted blood vessels and nerves in it to counter the height from which it would be bending to dabble about in the vegetation and shallow waters.
The legs of Presbyornis, remember, were not typically of duck and goose length, but more like their cousins the cranes and herons. This led to that height change and a need for blood flow regulation; think about when you bend over for a long time and then stand back up straight. Imagine a very tall duck with a head rush from bending over on its stilt like legs. It would probably be pretty funny actually. Now if we only had the soft tissue to study the mechanics of how it would work to not get dizzy and fall over. I personally do not know the best modern analog to this, however, I bet a giraffe's ability to bend over and drink and a flamingo's ability to feed by bending over are fairly good modern examples of the types of mechanics we would expect to see in this animal. Conversely, maybe it didn't need to feed with its head below its belt at all. Perhaps it used those long legs, rather unlike a crane, to wade into belly deep water (negating the space and milliseconds of advantage in distancing below surface predators speculated on earlier) and fed at a much more comfortable angle. All of this is speculation however as I have not read or found anywhere solid proof positive feeding habits of Presbyornis and have come to what are basically, my own conclusions and conjectures.
03 July 2012
Prebyornis Papers Prove Problematic
The issue with finding papers today has not so much been that there are no papers that mention or discuss Presbyornis available so much as there are not very many that are specifically about Presbyornis on account, in part, due to the fact that most of the genus and species specific papers were written long before the internet and scanners were available. There are a number of papers which reference or discuss Presbyornis, such as this paper on evolutionary radiation during the Cretaceous, which give a lot of good insight into the genus and species. There have been new fossils found which are compared to Presbyornis or belong in its family and the papers on those are available. The Olson and Feduccia paper of 1980 is a paper I wish I could find to share on here, instead, all I have is an image from the paper:
02 July 2012
Special Evening Update
My wife created this design for my car slowly over the past four months. I rarely do evening updates, but I thought that the finishing of the design was well worth the post. It started out that she had wanted to put my name on the car, a very big Southern tradition it would seem, and I was pretty firmly against it. When she got the ability to cut out dinosaurs in vinyl I softened a great deal to decorating my car, because I'm a nerd. I figured that she would want to represent herself, so we sat down and decided how we would make a boy and girl dinosaur out of the two she could cut with her machine, she takes orders for custom vinyl cut outs, by the way, and we then got them onto the car.
A little later on she got a program to cut out a volcano, and every dinosaur needs a volcano.
And then lately, because I have seen a lot of cars that have memorials to loved ones plastered all over them, I asked "Can't we make a memorial to dinosaurs?" Everyone should remember dinosaurs, they were a pretty big deal for a long time after all. Anyhow, the design is now done and I thought everyone should share in my happiness at the finishing of the entire piece.
A little later on she got a program to cut out a volcano, and every dinosaur needs a volcano.
And then lately, because I have seen a lot of cars that have memorials to loved ones plastered all over them, I asked "Can't we make a memorial to dinosaurs?" Everyone should remember dinosaurs, they were a pretty big deal for a long time after all. Anyhow, the design is now done and I thought everyone should share in my happiness at the finishing of the entire piece.
Short Entry Monday
There is not much in the way of videos for Presbyornis, but there is an interesting image from Witmer's lab at Ohio University which compares the olfactory sections of some brains, one being Presbyornis which is pretty interesting and so, without much in the movie category today, I will certainly share that one around.
As you can see in the clip the olfactory senses of Presbyornis actually have a fairly spacious are of the brain available to them, which most of us probably would not associate with ducks, however, if they did not have an area as small as a pigeon's they certainly must have still been using it and needed it.
01 July 2012
Ancient Ducks For Modern Children
I have a good resource for us today that I found over a month ago and got permission for and everything. This is the kind of thing I love to share that will allow the children to use their imaginations, and the adults too, and have some fun coloring and sharing family time. What we have is a make your own Presbyornis activity:
In the case of Presbyornis there is no children related page, toys, or children's books, unless you count Currie and Sovak's book mentioned yesterday. So instead of worrying about a lot of facts today with the children in your life, just have fun imagining and creating stories. We do a lot of reading, watching clips, and artistic things on the "family days" around here, so why not change a little and make this a day you can create a story together, right a little, perhaps even create your own story book!
©http://archaephoenix.deviantart.com/ |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)